Fix the San Francisco airport

My regular readers know that I frequently complain about the low quality of government at the local level. I not only complain about the political absurdity of a socialist San Francisco city government that tries to run our individual lives as a parent rather than as a competent government.  I complain that the government is incompetent at doing things that are needed.

2-14 SFOI woke up one morning and realized my approach is wrong. I know how to make government work.  I took my two main government tasks and asked myself how to use existing structures to solve the problems. We lack individuals who care and know how to make changes.

The first task that needs being solved is the San Francisco airport. (The second one is in the next blog). We have two landing runways and two take off runways at a 90° angle. On days when the cloud cover is too low, which is common in San Francisco, the two landing runways are too close together for the regular 60 landings per hour. With low clouds landings are reduced to 30 per hour. That consequently reduces the number of flights leaving the airport too.

The two landing runways could be expanded easily by expanding into the adjacent bay.

The environmental organizations that control the bay prohibited this. The current airport political organizations have looked into the issue and always deferred to the power of the environmental political groups.

If the airport were run on a lease to a private company, the private company could easily resolve the expansion of the runway problem. The private companies could offer hundreds of acres of currently used salt flats to replace the dozens of acres needed for the airport runway expansion. How do we get private management of the airport?

2-14 crashThe same way BART was created. By local initiative.  It took two elections for the BART initiative to pass.

San Francisco owns the airport and manages it even though it is in San Mateo County. We only need a local initiative in San Francisco directing the San Francisco Airport Commission to lease the airport to a private company.  There are several that run airports around the world.

The initiative must be very carefully written to make sure that it does not get commandeered by  politicians looking for a cushy job. That will cost about $100,000 in legal fees.

An initiative in an off year election will cost another $100,000.

That's how we can do it. For $200,000 we can have a world-class functioning airport that does not shut down every time the fog rolls in.

Response

  1. Phil Ossiferz Stone Avatar

    >The two landing runways could be expanded easily by expanding into the adjacent bay.
    …just in time for the major earthquake for which we are already overdue.
    I respectfully suggest we should be shoring up and repairing our existing infrastructure, not building new stuff. Most of it is Third World-tier undermaintained anyway.

Leave a Reply

Search


Connect On Social


Post Categories


Latest Comments


  1. Richard Katz's avatar
  2. Susan's avatar

    Hi Michael// Long time since we’ve communicated! Are you still in the PR of SF?? Aside from catching up on…

  3. Unknown's avatar

    As I've said before: Just as the hippie movement was not leftist, or even political, the environment movement wasn't either,…

  4. Michael Phillips's avatar

    I'll stick by the original.  No Jew hate in China or Japan where the whole population is educationally competent. India…

  5. Curious George's avatar

    > Jews are hated because they have been able to read, write, and do math for 3,000 years and virtually…

Discover more from Pro Commerce

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading