I seem to be hearing about privacy a great deal these days on the radio and in conversation. The discussions about privacy appear to focus on a loss of privacy due to federal legislation and corporate data collection.
About 99% of this discussion seems based on a fallacious notion of privacy. Let me state what privacy is. Privacy, to the extent that it ever existed, has a history starting in Greece and running through Western society via common law and the U.S. Constitution.
Privacy refers to the physical non-public domain that exists in your personally owned domicile. Got it? That is what privacy is.
Let us explore this concept for a moment. When you step out of your home, you are in public space. Virtually nothing you do from that point on is private. Shopping is public. Buying and selling are public acts. Driving is public and so is the space inside your car because other drivers and pedestrians need to be able to see you and, for safety reasons, try to discern your intentions. Covering the rear side windows is OK but the police can still look inside the car for booze if they have probable cause.
Phone conversations are considered to occur in a private space derived from the earlier idea of sealed envelopes. Postcards are not private nor are their descendants, unencrypted emails, because they are considered “open” communication.
Don’t use politeness as a measure of privacy. It is rude to overhear other people’s conversation at a table next to you; but rudeness is not a genuine invasion of privacy.
If you are in a space for which you don’t have title, such as a friend’s home, you are riding on the friend’s domain of privacy. Similarly, if you rent an apartment or rent a hotel room, you have a contractual form of title and you have your own private space.
The borderlines in the definition of privacy are found in many areas. Going to the toilet in a public space, such as a department store, is not genuinely private (it is also not public although there is a presumption that a toilet conveys privacy). The toilet privacy can only be overridden by concerns about criminality.
Having an estate that is obscured from the public still doesn’t let you hunt on your own property because other notions (the free ranging wildness of animals) override privacy. Similarly, you can’t mistreat your children in a private space because children are presumed to have a future public societal role and they need to be protected.
When you shop on your phone or on the internet from your home, those transactions are public because you are figuratively reaching out of the private space.
With this clarity on the meaning of privacy, most concerns about privacy turn out to be irrelevant.
PostScript (1): to know how Western these notions of privacy are, one needs to stay in a Japanese minshiku (pension). I’ve had my room changed while I was out and when I returned I found that my belongings had all been very neatly moved to the new room. Shocking invasion of privacy to an American. Very thoughtful thing to do for a Japanese.
PostScript (2): In Sweden the laws about private property were changed in the 1970s. Anyone can pass over your land, anytime, and even camp on it, if it doesn’t disturb your peace. I felt very strange camping on the beach of a lake, knowing that I was on private property.

The realtor, Harry Aleo, has a window full of anti-Lefty jokes, news clippings and sentimental old San Francisco photos. Harry calls his neighbors the “Looney Valley Liberals”.
The founder’s daughter had run this store and two others most of their 30 year run and sold all three in 2003. The new owners closed the Noe Valley store with no notice to anyone, including suppliers, and said they were going to remodel. There appears to be no activity by the new owners to remodel or re-open the store.
This photo on the right reflects two convivial triumphs. 
My friend Charlotte, in New York, was startled to hear the extent of anti-Semitism from the Left in San Francisco. Charlotte hasn’t seen it in New York. I immediately phoned my brother in Seattle to see what has been happening there and he says Seattle Lefties are exactly on the border of anti-Semitism and they could easily cross the line anytime.
We are a Lefty community with an assimilated local Jewish community that doesn’t frighten the anti-Semities. In these conditions, the Left automatically becomes anti-Semitic. Lefties hate Starbucks, global commerce, America, big corporations, the elite, the media — the only thing missing to hate are Jews. 
The NYTimes (Dec. 24) business editors may have run over to BILL CARTER’s desk after he wrote the following first paragraph: “In a startlingly quick reversal of strategy, executives at the broadcast networks are disavowing their previous disavowals of reality programming.”

